The Inkwell is a resource for First Year Composition at Florida State University. All the exercises and assignments have been submitted by FYC TAs and Instructors who have used them in their classrooms--from ENC 1905 to 1101/1102 and 1142/1145. Some TAs frequently surf the Inkwell for daily writing exercises and activities. Other TAs use the Inkwell to brainstorm their own writing exercises and activities.
We've grouped the exercises under the links below - feel free to surf and borrow at your leisure. This version of the Inkwell is an updated and expanded version of the original--created by John Grosskopf. "Paper Topics" and "Fiction Exercises" are new to the Inkwell - so there's not much here, yet. We're very interested in expanding these two new sections, in addition to the others. If you've got an exercise that you feel would make a good addition to the Inkwell--under any of the links--please submit it via e-mail to Liane Robertson at ler07c@fsu.edu or Emily J Dowd at edowd@fsu.edu.
“Arguments on Trial”
by
Doug Hattaway
Activity Accompanies: “The New American Epidemic” (OOW 2006-2007)
Time Required: 50 Minutes
Goal/Purpose: To teach students how to identify areas of their paper that will require additional research
Procedure: Instructor will divide the class into five groups, and each will read the first draft of “The New American Epidemic”. As students are reading the draft, they will act as defense attorneys for student drinking by picking out weaknesses in the original argument. Are there any claims the author makes without using supporting evidence? Does the argument employ vague generalizations? What counter-arguments could be made? Are these arguments addressed? After reading the paper, students will a “case” developed.
The next step will be to test this case against the paper’s final draft. Would you still be able to defend student drinking? What additions in the drafting process made this argument stronger? Are there any areas where additional research would strengthen this case?
Background for the Activity: When writing argumentative research essays, many students fall into the trap of supporting opinions with opinions. By forcing students to attack an argument, they will learn to be more aware of potential holes in their own arguments, and the importance of documented research when making assertions.
1. Title: “Deconstructing Source Integration”
2. Name(s) of the Authors of the Idea: Tana and Timothy Welch
3. Title (of the essay or section): Liam O’Flaherty’s “The Sniper” and the Irish Civil War
4. Goal/Purpose of the Activity: To show students how to successfully integrate outside sources with one’s own ideas in order to produce a new piece of writing.
5. Estimated Time Required for the Activity: This is a homework-based activity that will require a few days of the student’s time outside class. In-class time: two sessions.
6. Procedure to Follow:
Day One: Read and discuss “Liam O’Flaherty’s ‘The Sniper’ and the Irish Civil War.” Place students into small groups.
Homework: Assign each group one of the sources from essay. As homework, each group should then find, read, and summarize the source they are assigned. They should also reexamine “The Irish Civil War” and analyze the author’s use of their assigned source—paying attention to 1) how much of the source was directly quoted, 2) how the author used the source to back up his own view, 3) how well the sources strengthen the argument, and 4) how heavily the author relies on the source. This might be best accomplished by highlighting or marking the physical page to see where the sources appeared within the essay and making notes in the margins. Each member of the group should have their own photocopy of the source. It may also help to note the different ways the author transitions from his own words to source material.
Day Two: Each group should then present their findings to the class.
7. Background for the Activity, i.e., the source(s) which inspired the idea, readings that relate, etc.:
Many students believe a research paper is nothing more than stringing together a series of articles and then regurgitating them to the reader. By having students deconstruct a finished research paper, it is our hope that they will see the true purpose behind successfully utilizing sources. In the process, this should also help with quote integration and MLA citation. This will also give students practice looking for sources, especially when finding books in the library.
8. Other Comments, e.g., observations on using the activity, concerns or qualifications for using it, extra advice:
Ideally this exercise would have better success using a research paper with more sources.
Drawbacks—instructor will probably need to take a look at all the sources used in “The Irish Civil War.” There aren’t many sources used, so the groups will be large in nature. If the instructor wishes to have groups smaller than five, some groups can be assigned to look for additional sources the author could’ve used. Also, groupwork this size can become problematic, therefore it would help if, at the end, each student can write a reflective journal detailing their experience with the assignment as well as any issues they faced while working with their group. It may be useful to have the students read Liam O’Flaherty’s “The Sniper” in class. If the source is checked out from the library, they may gain additional experience by familiarizing themselves with the interlibrary loan. It may also be challenging to “share” a book within a group, however there may a group leader that photocopies the pertinent source material and then distributes this to the rest of the group.
Dialogue and Writing
by Kameelah Martin and Williams Hobbs
Activity Accompanies Jessica Mansfield's "Growing into Life" (2004-2005 OOW)
Time Required: 50 minutes
Goal/Purpose: Teaching students how to correctly incorporate dialogue into their writing
Procedure: Instructor is to choose one section of the essay that has a good deal of dialogue, remove all punctuation and formatting that indicates dialogue before class.
* Divide the students into five groups
* Assign the edited section of the essay to each group and instruct them to re-write it applying the correct punctuation, paragraph format, etc. They should have about 10-15 minutes to complete this task.
* Each group will then present their version of the dialogue to the class by acting it out as if on stage. Each group should take no more than 5 minutes.
* When each group has performed, the instructor will then ask the class to collectively determine which dialogue sounded “natural” and why.
* The instructor will then show the class the correctly punctuated section of the essay and entertain questions about how and why to correctly incorporate dialogue into an essay.
Background for the Activity: The essay itself used a lot of dialogue and many of our own students are intimidated by using dialogue which inspired the activity. Showing them how to use it correctly will hopefully alleviate any anxiety and help to improve the range of writing skills.
Additional Comments: Instructors may decide to allow student to use handbook for this activity, but I think the spontaneity will be more effective.
1. Title for the Activity: Dialogue Exercise
2. Name(s) of the Authors of the Idea: Kara Candito, Chris Findeisen, Lamar Garnes, Ashley Harris, Fayaz Kabani, Rebecca Lehmann, Lessig, Colin Lessig, Toby McCall, & Jenny Moffit
3. Essay(s) or section(s) the Activity Relates to
Author (if from Our Own Words): Allison Rose
Title (of the essay or section): “Sing with Me Somehow”
Edition: 2007-2008
URL(s) or page(s), or both if available: http://english3.fsu.edu/writing06/?q=node/550
4. Goal/Purpose of the Activity:
This is an exercise about writing dialogue. It teaches the students how to write realistic, engaging dialogue (content) as well as showing them the correct form; for example, how to use dialogue tags and correct punctuation.
5. Estimated Time Required for the Activity: 45 minutes
6. Procedure to Follow:
1) The students should have read the essay before class, and highlighted places in the essay where the author makes good use of dialogue. At the beginning of class, have a short discussion about the use of dialogue in the essay. Ask them where it works best and why, where they think there should be more dialogue, and why. Discuss the tags used and the appropriate use of punctuation within dialogue, i.e. use of quotation marks, commas, periods and question marks. Have students break up into groups of three or four. This exercise can work for classrooms with computers and without computers.
2) If you have a computer classroom, do a demonstration on the overhead projector. In a blank Word document, write two lines of dialogue, double-spaced. For example,
“Have you seen my cat?” Julie asked Cathy.
“No, I haven’t. Maybe you should check the back yard,” Cathy replied.
Then, scroll down the page so that only the last line of dialogue is displayed. The next person in the group will then only be able to see the last line of dialogue. That person must write two more lines of dialogue based on what they have just read, and scroll down the computer screen so that only the last line of dialogue that they wrote is showing. This process is continued with each group member repeatedly for about twenty minutes. If the classroom does not have computers, have the students use a piece of lined paper and just fold down the paper over the dialogue they have written, making sure to leave adequate space between each line of dialogue so it’s easily covered.
3) Up to this point, the group members have no idea what was written by the other members because they have only seen one line of dialogue at a time. After the twenty minutes is up, have each group look at the entire sequence of dialogue that they have created, and have them read the stories aloud. This often gets a few laughs from everyone.
4) If you have a computer classroom, have the students submit there dialogue exercise to the class web page so you can bring it up on the overhead projector. This way, you can examine each line of dialogue and discuss whether the form is correct. If you do not have computers, you can use the doc-cam to display the paper and discuss it that way.
7. Background for the Activity, i.e., the source(s), which inspired the idea, readings that relate, etc.:
A former creative writing professor of one of the group members inspired this activity.
8. Other Comments, e.g., observations on using the activity, concerns or qualifications for using it, extra advice:
We would recommend this activity when the students are writing personal essays or short stories in which they are using dialogue.
Activity Accompanies Meagan C. Arrastia's "The One I Took for
Granted” (2004-2005 McCrimmon Award Winner)
Time Required: 35 minutes
Goals/Purpose: The goal of this exercise is to encourage students
to explore ways to employ effective detail-driven transitions within their writing.
The model paper draws on a series of incidents in the student's life and ties
them together by finding "common threads." Many students feel that
one (usually boring) incident is enough to fill 5 or 6 pages. This exercise
allows them to connect many disparate events through one unifying theme. This
assignment can work with group papers or individual papers.
Procedure:
For Group Paper:
Divide the class into groups of three or four. Have them brainstorm on common
themes in their life (ex: "overcoming adversity," "growing pains,"
"influential people," "trips," "beliefs," etc).
The students will then list as many important moments or ideas that have defined
their lives and that they feel circle around this common theme. The groups will
select one event from each member’s list, based on which event sounds
the most interesting and that they'd all like to hear more about. It doesn't
matter how disparate the events or moments are. As a matter of fact, students
should be encouraged to choose events that don't tie together in obvious ways,
to make their group paper more interesting.
Each group member will then freewrite on his or her topic. After 10 minutes,
group members will come back together and share what they have written and try
to figure out how they can string the story together. Ideally, they will work
out ways to transition between the snapshots of the lives of different group
members in an engaging way.
For Individual Paper:
Estimated Time Required for Activity: 45 minutes
Students are asked to choose "a significant person," "a significant
event," and "a significant belief," and list them on a clean
sheet of paper. Below each "significant" header, students choose and
list three scenes or incidents that are especially vivid about that person,
event, or belief. They are encouraged to choose scenes that are far apart in
time and place and perhaps don't seem to connect in obvious ways.
Students then trade their paper with classmates. Each classmate votes for which
topic sounds the most interesting, based on the "scenes" listed. Students
should get at least half a dozen opinions from class members so they have established
where the reader's interests lie.
When students gets their sheets back, they are tied to the topic that received
the most "reader votes." For each scene in that topic, they start
listing the personal emotions they felt, the adjectives that describe the person,
event, or belief as well as their state of mind. The goal is to keep them from
tying their paper together in a simple chronological way, and to order it ideationally.
Hopefully, they find that in many of these scenes they were in a similar state
of mind.
Have them begin freewriting one of the scenes, and as soon as the student finds
themselves expounding on one of the adjectives or emotions that help tie the
scene together, they jump to the next scene (they can always come back later
to flesh out the scene fully, but they have the ever-important and ever-missing
from freshman writing transition). They do this until they've tied together
all their scenes, and they have the bare bones of a personal experience paper.
Background Readings: For other ways of "making connections,"
students can look at Becky Godlasky's essay "Using Metaphor to Make Connections,"
which is in The Inkwell. Also look at the Raymond Carver's poem "Sunday
Night," in Bishop's On Writing. (As Bishop writes, "what small, overlooked
elements might loom large in your composition?" In other words, how can
find unique connections in the minute details of your stories?)
Additional Comments: "The One I Took For Granted"
is the 2004 McCrimmon Award Winner and is chock full of good things that students
can learn from. Even if you don't use our exercise, this group doesn't believe
there is a better essay you can show your students for "what to do right."
Exploratory Drafting by Beth Nuckolls, Debi Carruth, Amanda Carr
Time Required: about 20-30 minutes
Goal/Purpose: Often times students will add to their drafts,
change grammar errors from time to time, but they don’t really go in and
change what they have already written significantly. The goal of this activity
is to show students radical ways to approach the drafting process – to
fall out of love with what they have already written. This exercise should help
students to realize that just because they have a good draft doesn’t mean
that it cannot be better, or different and just as good.
Procedure: While this may be a good story, it seems to jump
around, touching lightly on a number of different issues, but not fully exploring
any of them. As a class, discuss what this story is about, and list each answer
on the board. For example, this story is about friendship, the dangers of advertising,
the desire to fit in and/or be cool, visiting someone in jail who has wronged
you, etc. Then divide your class into groups, and set them to making a list
together along the following lines: If you were going to rewrite this draft,
and place more emphasis on (turn to the list and assign each group one of the
topics the class came up with), what would you need to add to the next draft?
What would you need to take away? After about ten or so minutes, have each group
present their findings.
Additional Comments:
If you wanted to take this further, you could: